Obama, Useful Idiot
March 17, 2011 8:13 PM
The is a long-standing controversy among critics of Barack Hussein Obama. Some view him merely as an inexperienced incompetent, elevated from a position of obscurity because of his rock-star qualities, especially his status as America's "historic first Black president." Others view him an ideologue with an agenda, an agenda which appears to be the socialist transformation of America, or the economic destruction of America, or both. So who is the real Obama, incompetent boob, or brilliant, dangerous ideologue?
My answer: Obama is both. But how could that be? How can any man be both a bumbling fool and a revolutionary mastermind? The answer lies in the belief system of hard-core, inner-circle left-wing cadres, the activists behind Obama who want to transform America by any means necessary, including economic destruction.
By "hard-core, inner-circle left-wing cadres" am I referring to a conspiracy? No. It is a plan, and it is not secret. It is public knowledge, and not just on kook websites. It is within reach of one mouse-click, and usually, one not need to seek farther than Wikipedia to find out much about it.
What these "cadres" called? They like to call themselves, "The Left." Historically, they have been known as Marxist-Leninists, Bolsheviks, and Communists. During the Cold war, those who opposed them called them "Commies." Their goal: transform society by ending capitalism. Their strategy: destroy the economy of the world's most powerful capitalist country, the USA. Their core value: collectivism.
Collectivism is the opposite of individualism, which is viewed as the root of all evil by Marxist-Leninists. Individual rights and individual success are not only meaningless according to their world-view, they are dangerous. They undermine their "revolution."
That, then, is the key to Obama's role as a useful idiot. There is no single person in charge of achieving the objectives of the Marxist-Leninist agenda. Everything is done by committees, some of whose members are publicly identified, and some are not. Orders, just as during the Soviet era, are passed on from one "cell" to another, and members of each cell are protected from knowing too much. Too much in this context means privileged and potentially destructive information that could be revealed if any individual changes his mind about the value to humanity of the Marxist "revolution," is bought off, or (as in Cold War days) breaks under torture.
In my opinion, Barack Hussein Obama is doing his job according to Marxist-Leninist standards, which is to campaign for re-election in 2012, attack ideological enemies (supporters of the Constitution, known as "right-wing extremists") spread propaganda using lies, distortions, and vicious attacks, and agitate, agitate, agitate. (The Marxist-Leninist code phrase for agitation is "community organizing.")
What is not Obama's job assignment from his controlling cadres is to make important political decisions, and especially not to lead the USA in its customary role as a world power. In fact, Obama is supposed to be ignorant. Ignorance is relative bliss when committees are making the decisions and calling the shots. Playing golf is much safer than risking overstepping the bounds of his revolutionary mission. To be useful is to be merely a cog in a machine.
Do the cadres who rule the hijacked "Democrat" Party view Obama as an idiot or a fool, useful though he may be? My best guess is that they do not. I believe they see him as a rather simple-minded and relatively naive academic with the ability to deliver a meaningless speech and make it seem meaningful. I believe that they view him as extremely loyal to the Marxist-Leninist cause and, despite his overinflated ego, a subordinate willing to follow orders.
To those of us whose goal is to restore Constitutional government to the USA, however, Obama, the Commander-in-Chief who prefers to vote "present," who prefers to play golf while Libya burns, does appear to be a bumbling fool. An idiot. And, in that sense, Obama is the most useful idiot that the Marxist-Leninists ever had in the 94 years or so of their history.